People have been running up to the GPS offices to read public record emails and making formal requests for public records, then starting a whole lot of Facebook chatter about their discoveries. We think it’s great, because sunshine kills vampires!*
In the interests of transparency and informing the Gilbert community about important news, we quote below an email that was posted on a Facebook group. The subject was how the GPS Governing Board President was silenced by the Interim Superintendent and an Assistant Superintendent during a board meeting as she was reading prepared remarks that had been vetted by the board’s lawyer. The background was described in this news article:
Gilbert Public Schools’ board president hinted at a 2013 internal investigation into public-records destruction during a discussion about a new policy to strengthen records management at a school-board meeting Tuesday night (April 8, 2014). During a discussion about the policy, Burk said that when “the e-mail system was deleted, there were a number of people that had outstanding public-records requests, including myself, for some of the records that were on that server that was erased.”
Burk said some of the documents people had requested were “related to financial dealings and concerns” in the district. Burk referenced a former administrator and a previous bidding process when Assistant Superintendent Clyde Dangerfield, who oversees finance and legal issues, interjected. “Mrs. Burk, I’d really like to point out that there are people that you’re talking about here (and) that it’s a very dangerous discussion because there are individual rights involved,” Dangerfield said. “And I’m not sure it’s fair to have the discussion you’re having in a public board meeting without those individuals being represented.”
Burk began to speak when interim Superintendent Jim Rice cut in. “Mrs. Burk, I really have a problem with this being discussed as well,” Rice said. “We have an investigation that is supposedly being taken place … we should not enter into any conversation at all regarding this.” Burk again began to speak when board member Lily Tram interjected, saying that the board had yet to discuss the police investigation or see the documents Burk provided police. Burk told Tram, “You have the documents I gave to the police.” Tram responded, “No, no.”
Following is an email that was sent to Dr. Jim Rice, Interim Superintendent of Gilbert Public Schools, and to Assistant Superintendent Clyde Dangerfield, Esquire on April 9, 2014 that shines a whole new light on the events in the linked news article:
There is chatter on Facebook as to how and why Lily Tram and Jill Humpherys were allowed to carry on for several minutes reading from unproven allegedly slanderous allegations regarding Sarah Green and Gladys Mopecha, but I was quickly shut down when I carefully selected my words and even used the word allegedly. It is not allegedly because Barb VeNard herself admitted to me that she sent the emails and the reporter obviously had copies because she wrote about them, but that was not the point.
I was about to go into how the policy had the potential for helping people understand why it was that a certain group felt the way they did and mistrusted. But then, Clyde, you know that. We all know that all of this stuff happened before the Greens came into the picture and that there was a large group that did not trust because of records issues long before the Greens began writing or even got involved with the District. The group of citizens that still have not received the emails are those that mistrust and for that very reason and some of them opposed the override.
As you know, Jim, I mentioned that I wanted us to just come out publicly and say, “Look this happened.” We know it. You both know it. Most of the boardroom knows about it.
But come out and say, “Yes, we know the server was deleted, and this is what we are doing and have done to ensure that something like that doesn’t ever happen again.” The Barracuda system was one thing, the police investigation is another, the staff training and the policy. I know, Jim, that you said Lily and Jill do not want to issue a statement on it, but as you could see, there are still members of the public that haven’t forgotten. I know several others that were not at the meeting and they, too, have not forgotten. I am not saying to continue to re-hash it but to come out and say that it happened, there was some mistrust and this is what we are doing to fix the situation could go a long way in healing the mistrust. What happened tonight with trying to shut it down and hide and cover up and not talk openly about what is really going on is only going to strengthen the divide.
I was about to say that this policy could go a long way into helping to rebuild the trust with those members of the community. I had it all written out to talk about the reasons for the requests for records, the mistrust and how the approval of the policy should help to rebuild. They could tangibly see with the policy that we were taking steps to improve their confidence and show that we value transparency and trust. Instead they saw the same behavior that led to the situation to begin with.
Additionally, I am concerned also that there does seem to be a lack of congruence, Clyde, as to when you choose to jump in and cut off conversation to protect individual rights. If you do not like the person, it is just fine if a couple of board members carry on, mentioning all sorts of unproven allegations for which you have in your possession evidence that counters the things being said. But in this instance, I didn’t even use Barb’s name and went way overboard using alleged when we all know she sent the emails to Jim, and you jumped right in.
I am really having trouble understanding the inconsistency.
From the comments below the original post: “Barb VeNard forwarded her husband emails containing details of the network deal, while her husband sold HP products and the network deal was between HP and Cisco. That happened while she was supervising the IT. After there were questions from the community, the server with all the emails just happened to be accidentally wiped clean.” There is a link to another Arizona Republic article about the incident. Of course, this is only ONE speculative reason why GPS officials would destroy records on a server to deny access to public records that had been requested by citizens.
Another comment: “Leave Barb Alone? The woman sent emails with pricing information to her husbands email while he was an HP product salesman and it was a competitive bid between HP and Cisco. Not surprising HP won. The Republic got ahold of the emails and wrote a story about them. Parents ask for them and poof the server with the emails are deleted. All this while Barb is over the IT department.” Perhaps the public is starting to understand why it’s so important for the GPS Governing Board to get to the bottom of the server destruction!
As for Lily Tram and Jill Humpherys saying defamatory, venomous things about two teachers, at the time they made those remarks, Lily and Jill knew full well that their remarks would be enshrined in video and archived on the official Gilbert Public Schools website. Just when you think GPS will come to their senses and quit violating laws and district policies, someone in a position of power does something incredibly stupid … again. BTW, what Jill and Lily were reading from appear to have been Defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment, which were totally disputed and proven to be inaccurate and flat-out wrong in the lawsuit. Ooopsie, Jill and Lily didn’t read the opposition, obviously. So they began a deliberate smearing spree, attacking two teachers with great glee.
Jill Humpherys and Lily Tram seem to have forgotten that Gilbert Public Schools PAID a lot of money for the misdeeds and wrongdoings of GPS superintendents and administrators. Gilbert Public Schools didn’t pay money out of the goodness of their hearts, you know. Now Lily Tram and Jill Humpherys have inflicted even more damage on the reputations of two teachers who stood up to the GPS Good Old Boys. Cue the music!
From Daniele Quinteros: ”If what was said about Gladys and Sarah was not true then why only hire back Sarah????” Indeed!
Big Fat Asterisk: Some states call public records laws “Sunshine Laws;” we agree that sunshine is the best disinfectant. And vampire killer.
With top dogs high-tailing it out of GPS these days, we took another look at stipends that change salaries for the favored few. Yeppers, what we found goes a long way toward explaining how the GPS Good Old Boys operated for so long: stipends for the favored few. Frozen pay scales for the rest. Except regular support staff who lost 1% of their pay and all employees who saw a big jump in health insurance costs. The top dogs don’t pay for their own health insurance, so they partied on.
We posted about two top dogs, Shane McCord and Jeff Filloon, who helped themselves to an extra cool $2,000 each for 2 years for doing nothing, for a total (that we uncovered thus far) of $8,000 in 2012-2013 and 2013-2014. Both of these top dogs joined the so-called exodus of GPS employees. But lookie here at a fun fact: Shane McCord is going to Mesa Public Schools at a lower level position than he left, and Jeff Filloon did the same thing when he accepted a job as HR Director in Chandler. They won’t be top dogs for a while, and they’ll be lucky to survive the coming storm of investigations into misuse of public funds to reward themselves for nothing.
About that so-called exodus: the HR reports for the next board meeting show very few resignations and retirements in GPS. Certified employees: 19 resignations and 3 retirements, which includes one elementary school principal and one teacher married to a high school principal who already announced his resignation. Classified employees: 25 resignations and 16 retirements. Some exodus. Do you think that the mass hysteria in the past couple of weeks was ginned up by The Usual Suspects* to deflect attention from the missing public records and ongoing lawsuits that continue to enmesh GPS in legal battles? Sure, it was all coincidental and spontaneous. <snark>
The agenda for that meeting includes the first read of GPS Policy EHB, Records Management. Lookie here, now there’s a warning about criminal penalties as well as strict direction to the superintendent to preserve emails properly. It sure sounds like Dave is building his defense: “It wasn’t against board policy when I destroyed those public records.” Sorry, Dave, the laws were already in place. Now the board has locked the place down.
Anyone having custody or possession of any record who steals, or knowingly and without lawful authority destroys, mutilates, defaces, alters, falsifies, removes or secretes all or part of any record, or permits any other person to do so, is guilty of a class four (4) felony.
… The Governing Board is the custodian of the official copies of all records, required or optional, and the Superintendent shall be responsible for protecting such records on behalf of the Board. All electronic communications and any attachments to the communication will be maintained by the District on a system to maintain a copy and retrieve the information. Electronic communications and attachments shall be managed and retained according to the “General Retention Schedule for School Districts and Charter Schools” of the Arizona State Library, Archives and Public Records Division of the Arizona Secretary of State.
Today’s subject is stipends, although we got distracted. That’s the way it is when you’re peeling the layers of the onion that is GPS administration. Each layer reveals new data (and hard-fought data at that!) and you have to stay the course to figure out what’s going on. Today’s onion peeling revealed MORE STIPENDS than we knew existed. Somehow, given the mushroom treatment the Governing Board usually gets, we suspect this will be news to many board members.
All of the discussions of which we were aware were limited to teacher stipends in GPS. Then we discovered administrators were getting annual stipends for professional development. At one point, that stipend was $800 per administrator, and to the best of our knowledge that money was in addition to partying at swanky resorts and calling it ‘professional development.’ That was before we found out about the McCord and Filloon special stipends. There has been extensive discussion about teacher stipends, especially during the days when GPS decided to withdraw stipends from elementary music teachers. (That subject will have its own post soon. Patience, Grasshopper.)
The support staff stipends range from itsy-bitsy to grand on the scale of dollars. We thought you loyal viewers would enjoy seeing who has been getting what on the support staff side. Let’s start with the 2012 Longevity Incentive. Fifty one employees divided a pot of $15,000. The 2013 Longevity Incentive had 93 employees dividing the same $15,000 pot.
There’s more, of course: other support staff stipend reports show amounts ranging from $150.00 per employee to a ”MAX” of $3,600 (that appears to be just for this list). Look at the Stipends for 2010-2011: 258 employees received $142,425.00 in an “addendum” stipend report. So perhaps there were more employees and/or more money going into stipends that year. Stipends for 2012 show 266 employees receiving $151,975.00. Stipends for 2012-2013 show 271 employees receiving $151,300.00. Stipends for 2013-2014 show 271 employees receiving $157,101.76. We’re very interested in this. Our first birdie chirp was about how GPS employees who worked at the big white building could supplement their pay by as much as $10,000 a year. Another birdie chirped to us that Nikki Blanchard gave raises to her HR employees before she retired. That’s the Gilbert Way: 100 years of tradition unhampered by progress.
There were other pathways to more money for certain select “special” GPS classified staffers. We saw that Good Old Clyde Dangerfield joined up with Jeff Filloon to promote Purchasing Manager Crystal Korpan to a coordinator slot (more $$$) without the board’s approval. They got caught, but managed to push through the promotion anyway a few months later. Now we have a famous “Friday Memo,” the Superintendent’s regular Report to the Board, about that cute little promotion and more. In May of 2013, while Good Old Dave was playing games with 2% stipends for all to influence the vote on the 2012 override, he really, really wanted to promote Crystal because she “does an excellent job.” He also claimed she had an MBA degree, which doesn’t show on Crystal’s resume, but what the hey, Dave wanted to give Crystal a raise and he apparently would say anything to get it done. Apparently, in GPS, you don’t need a college degree to hold a director position (higher than a coordinator) – which is really cute considering that Crystal, as a coordinator, earns TWO teachers’ salaries. Directors can earn as much as THREE teachers’ salaries. That’s the Gilbert Way … again.
Showing what a GOB he was, Dave also decided that since Gary Fujino was resigning as Coordinator of Assessment, he wanted to acquiesce to Good Old Barb VeNard’s request to promote that job to a director position (more $$$). So why in the world would Dave let Gary Fujino move to Chandler for more money, and then promote someone else into a higher level job? Doesn’t make sense, except that Barb was building her empire within GPS. Dave got the superintendent job she wanted, so it looks like Barb was building an empire so she could take back the job she never had.
Keyboard: Hey, that sounds like the “take back our board” crowd, scheming to take back seats for certain board members who got themselves unelected by the voters. Same faulty logic.
Taking that faulty logic a step farther, look at Jeff Filloon’s Technology Department Salaries report from March 2013. Tech Services had TWO network positions that had been vacant for 18 months. GPS has trouble finding replacements, and can’t attract programmers with experience, nor can GPS attract and retain technology repair staff. Salaries are super low (had not been raised since 2000) and employees have little or no opportunity for advancement. GPS had known this for a long, long time, but Tech Services was part of Barb VeNard’s empire and was enmeshed in all kinds of controversies concerning public dollars that seemed to disappear down a rabbit hole. Jeff’s solution: a needs assessment and internal review. Great. No wonder the IT dude resigned!
It’s a good thing that change is coming to GPS top levels. It’s way overdue. We’re not done peeling this onion. Stay tuned.
Big Fat Asterisk: We noticed the Arizona School Boards Association (AZSBA), Arizona Schools Risk RetentionTrust (The Trust), Arizona Education Association (AEA) and Gilbert Education Association (GEA) have been front and center in the swirling controversies they ginned up. Hey, the Executive Director of the Gilbert Education Foundation, Leanne McEachran, was in the audience for the last board meeting! Word gets around fast when people swear at the Board from the ‘safety’ of the peanut gallery. Tsk, tsk.
You would think the sky is falling with all the noise about how Gilbert Public Schools is going to the dogs because a few administrators are leaving ahead of a new superintendent taking over the district. We call it a clean sweep of assistant superintendents who are self-selecting for their own departures.
That’s right, all four assistant superintendents will be gone by June 30, 2014. Westie will stay on top of oversight, though, having learned how much damage these short-timers can still inflict on GPS. We recently learned about a new ton of bricks that’s about to fall on GPS, which might explain some of the
so-called exodus clean sweep, along with police investigations and recent revelations of wrongdoing.
We have new information for you about one of the administrators who self-selected to skedaddle: Vicki Hester. It was fortuitous that she landed a job in the Mesa School District at just the right time … before the news hit about another police report and drugs endangering students at Meridian Elementary School. Meridian is the GPS school that Vicki Hester is leaving; she’ll be principal at Salk Elementary School in Mesa, a smaller school in a diverse community. Salk’s current principal, Dr. Karla Carlson, is retiring. Hey, lookie here: Vicki Hester finally gets the A+ School designation she so craved! Too bad someone else earned it and Vicki Hester just inherits it.
The news about drugs endangering students at Meridian Elementary School comes from a parent, who tried time and again to work with GPS top dogs and with Vicki Hester. The parent encountered the usual GPS reaction to something they didn’t want to hear: “Go ahead, file your claim!” We very helpfully attached to this post a copy of the police report and the parent’s Notice of Claim against GPS.
The Notice of Claim is a formality required by Arizona law. The process was intended to open communication and head off litigation, but GPS admins ignore Notices of Claim. That’s not what the legislators envisioned when they wrote this law, but that’s what it has become. Members of the Governing Board are routinely told to ignore Notices of Claim. They all go to ASRRT, The Trust, to be litigated from Day One. “We don’t want to walk all over somebody when they don’t deserve it,” Good Old Mike Tiffany said in a recent board meeting. Obviously, if someone files a Notice of Claim, The Trust and the GPS GOBs believe that citizen truly deserves the fire and brimstone issued by the Lawyers’ Perpetual Employment Society,BS the lawyers who work for “The Trust.”
The story of what happened at Meridian Elementary School is pretty much the same old thing from the usual suspects, according to the Notice of Claim. A child brought narcotics to school, because a parent put them in a pill bottle in a lunch box. When the claimant parent discovered that 30 narcotic pills had been issued, but only one was in the bottle discovered in the lunch box after school, the claimant parent sounded the alarm with Principal Vicki Hester. For all the claimant parent knew, the child had taken the entire bottle to school without any supervision. Who knows what could have happened if the child had ‘shared’ with classmates? Being unable to contact the other parent quickly, the claimant parent called the Mesa Police and Mesa Fire Department to help determine the extent of the emergency in terms of the child’s health. Then, the claimant parent addressed the situation with Meridian Principal Vicki Hester.
The claimant parent was rightfully upset, because only days before Vicki Hester had told both parents how the narcotic drug could be administered at school, and it certainly wasn’t by letting the young student self-administer a pill from a lunch box. There was a strict procedure to be followed, involving the child’s health care provider and the school nurse. The parent was to bring the prescribed drug to the school nurse personally, not send in a bottle in a lunch box that was never delivered to the nurse. Vicki Hester told the claimant parent, “The school has a zero tolerance policy, which prohibits a child from bringing illicit drug(s) to school, so be rest assured the school will follow procedure.”
Obviously, the discovery of the pill bottle in the child’s lunch box meant the zero tolerance policy had been totally ignored by one parent. The claimant parent was not only angry, but terribly worried that Meridian students had been endangered, especially if 30 or so pills were missing. The claimant parent asked to have the entire school notified that narcotic drugs had been brought to school and lost by a child who had just begun taking the medication and was oblivious to the drug’s strength and danger. Notifying all parents could have quickly established whether other students had acquired any of the missing pills. Doing this would have made Vicki Hester look pretty bad as a principal, though. Want to guess what happened next?
The claimant parent says the other parent is “friends” with Vicki Hester, so the whole thing was swept under the rug. The parent who sounded the alarm didn’t hear from Vicki Hester, who apparently relied on assurances from the friend-of-Vicki parent rather than investigate and report. The friend-of-Vicki parent claimed two pills were in the bottle that was sent to school with the child. Vicki Hester later said it was only one pill, so nothing to see here, folks.
The parent says that with a zero tolerance policy, the student should have been expelled. This shouldn’t be so hard for the claimant parent. School principals should be able to navigate a smart course to keep both parents involved in their children’s education. The principal should be as concerned as the parent about keeping students safe while they are at school. But this is Meridian Elementary School in GPS, where policies and procedures seem to depend on who is involved.
The upset claimant parent contacted Superintendent Jack Keegan, Assistant Superintendent Shane McCord and Administrative Services Director Joyce Meyer, all of whom apparently refused to get involved or investigate or do any of the Very Important Things that they usually do in the big white district office building. Now we all know that Jack, Shane and Joyce are flying the GPS chicken coop, so it’s pretty easy to understand they didn’t want to get involved. It appears Vicki Hester just shrugged things off, giving one parent preferential treatment and giving the other parent the cold shoulder, with the blessing of the Top Dogs. Then Vicki Hester got busy shopping around her resume just like her supervisor did, it appears.
There’s more to this story … with GOBs, there’s always more, it seems. The claimant parent describes an incident of possible sexual misconduct at Meridian that happened a few months earlier. In that case, the claimant parent involved Good Old Jack Blanchard. According to the Notice of Claim, this was swept under the rug, too. This story may hang around for a couple of years: if litigation results, there’s a process called ‘discovery’ where details get uncovered. For example, recent lawsuits uncovered how long it took Good Old Dave Allison to destroy the paper files and delete electronic files of his superintendency.
Now that GPS has Dr. Jim Rice as Interim Superintendent, maybe he’ll look into what is going to get the district sued this time. Maybe Dr. Rice can bring some sanity and common sense into the GPS administration. Heaven knows, we’ve all been waiting for a long, long time.
Just remember, citizens of the Town of Gilbert, you could have elected Westie as Interim Superintendent! We won’t hold a grudge, though, because the GOB self-selection process occurred anyway. Bye-bye GOBs. Welcome, Breath of Spring Air, also known as Dr. Christina Kishimoto!
Former Interim Superintendent Jack Keegan just can’t stay away from Gilbert Public Schools. Birdies are chirping [loudly] in dismay. The Good Old Boys have shown that when they hang around after announcing their intention of leaving, they have opportunities for mischief.
Now, Good Old Jack, along with his fellow cut-and-run practitioners, Assistant Superintendent Shane McCord and Athletic Director Mark Cisterna, are making decisions about which GPS jobs will be cut and how much parents will soon pay for their children to participate in GPS programs. GPS employees are really angry that three dudes who couldn’t cut the mustard are hanging around to do the Zero Based Budgeting process for the district, which won’t take effect until the 2014-2015 school year, when they’ll be long gone.
Cue the song: Hit the Road, Jack.
Hit the road Jack and don’t you come back
No more, no more, no more, no more
Hit the road Jack and don’t you come back no more
Who will be left to live with the GPS ZBB? The loyal employees who have stayed with the district through thick and thin, that’s who. For months, librarians, nurses, specials teachers and many other GPS employees have been holding their breath, waiting to find out if their jobs will be funded next year. It’s been hard on them, to say the least. What kind of reward will they reap for their loyalty? Who knows, but those dudes bragging about making the ZBB decisions (you really didn’t think those committees had any power, did you?) won’t be around when loyal GPS employees get the axe.
Good Old Jack said he would hang around and do the ZBB stuff FOR FREE. Do you really believe he is being magnanimous after his temper tantrum didn’t have the desired effect and the board didn’t crawl around begging him to stay? It might be as simple as it’s still cold up north, and he has a lease on his Gilbert digs for another few months … like until the end of his contract term, perhaps? After all, GPS paid him $10,000 to relocate, and if you believe GPS got their money’s worth, well, we have a bridge for sale. Nope, something is up, or else someone is still being protected. Maybe it’s both, but it sure isn’t out of the goodness of his heart that double-dipping Jack Keegan is sticking around to supervise the GPS budget process.
Many people in the Town of Gilbert and in GPS had high hopes when Dr. Jack Keegan rode in on his white horse. We hoped he would temporarily man the helm of GPS after Good Old Dave Allison
got himself invited to retire had the Governing Board decline his request to stay after his contract expired in 2013. The way the timing worked out, GPS hired an interim superintendent for a year while they searched for a new Superintendent. Good Old Jack had a halo when he arrived … mostly because he was NOT Dave Allison. Westie’s pal Keyboard had a tremendous crush on Jack Keegan, and it was very painful for her to watch his diminishment and then his temper tantrum which ended in his abrupt resignation eight months into his interimnity. Maybe Good Old Jack thought the various board members would come crawling to him, begging him to stay, during the thirty days of his notice of quitting.
It seems that Good Old Jack was drinking the GOB Kool-Aid all along. When he came to Gilbert, he touted his skills and experience as a superintendent. But after being here a short while, he was doing his best to block access to requests for public records. Then, in January 2014, he just flat-out threw one of his temper tantrums after we asked for access to some public records:
Since your request was just to review the records, you will not be allowed to photograph, scan or otherwise copy any of these documents. If you decide that you would like to have copies of the records, you will need to make a separate, written, request for which specific records you would like to have copied. Upon payment, you will be provided copies of the records you requested.
Good Old Jack helpfully sent copies of his letter to a lot of people. This must have been part of his temper tantrum: “There, I’ll show them, I’ll tell all these important people how I stiffed this impertinent request to review public records!” Copies went to Georgia Staton, Attorney; Susan Segal, Attorney; and to GPS Assistant Superintendents Clyde Dangerfield, Jeff Filloon, and Shane McCord.
There was a slight problem with Good Old Jack’s letter – he was violating Arizona Public Records laws. Yeppers, even though he had a slew of lawyers at his beck and call, Good Old Jack couldn’t get it right. Worse, just a month before Jack Keegan pulled this dumb stunt, the Attorney General of the State of Arizona issued an official Attorney General Opinion regarding A.R.S. 39-121, Inspection of Public Records. That statue has just 25 words: “Public records and other matters in the custody of any officer shall be open to inspection by any person at all times during office hours.”
The Arizona Attorney General’s Opinion states: ”In the event that a member of the public seeks to inspect public records and make copies using his or her own personal device, Arizona’s public records law does not allow a public body to charge a fee.” Maybe Jack Keegan was just trying to intimidate ordinary citizens who dared ask to see records of how GPS officials do their jobs. Transparency, Schmansparency. Of course, journalists and people considered “friends” can just come by and copy anything they want, no problem.
Wouldn’t you know it, Jack Keegan had to backtrack after we helpfully sent a copy of his temper tantrum letter to the Arizona Attorney General. Nine days later, Good Old Jack wrote to us again:
As a reminder from my previous letter, since your request was to review material, it will be necessary that if you decide you wish copies of material that you submit another FOIA request identifying specifically the material you wish to obtain a copy of. [sic]
This time, Good Old Jack copied three attorneys: Susan Segal, Georgia Staton and Liz Gilbert, in addition to the newest member of the GPS Community Relations staff. Notice that Jack Keegan didn’t let his assistant superintendents know that he had to eat crow. It’s long past time to hit the road, Jack. Take your silly syntax with you.
All you citizens who want to review GPS records, be sure to write “review and scan or otherwise copy” in your request. Save yourself the extra step and needless delay of submitting another FOIA request to actually receive a copy of the records you are reviewing. You’re welcome!
Gilbert Public Schools is getting a clean sweep of Good Old Boys from the superintendency right in time for Dr. Kishimoto’s grand entrance. We’re hearing lots of speculation about some mass exodus from GPS, but that’s not what’s happening. It looks like some members of the superintendency are skipping out to avoid getting caught with their hands in the cookie jar.*
Some folks are moaning and groaning and gnashing their teeth over the retirements and resignations in GPS that are becoming known. ”It’s all the fault of the Governing Board,” they cry with crocodile tears. ”It’s the Governing Board’s fault the 2012 and 2013 overrides didn’t pass, now GPS has to reduce expenditures by millions of dollars,” they wail. Some folks in cushy district jobs have well-founded fears that their jobs won’t exist next year, so some have already announced they’re jumping ship. Unfortunately for many of those folks, they might have to start working a lot more, without getting all the vacation days their contracts allow, PLUS all the district holidays like Fall Break, Winter Break and Spring Break, to name a few benefits regular GPS employees don’t get. If you have all that time off, you can save your paid vacation and sick days until you’re ready to leave, and take a few months off while receiving full health benefits and racking up some extra retirement points, right, Community Relations Director Dianne Bowers?
Here’s some background information about why some top-level administrators are resigning from GPS right now. Mostly, it’s the season: administrators who want to leave generally turn in notice of resignation or retirement before contracts are issued each year, which occurs in early spring (March-April). The same thing is happening in every school district in the state, because state law drives this bus. Administrators in other school districts are watching for opportunities, such as the positions that will be open in GPS – those same candidates will have to give notice to their current employer within the same window. Really, it’s all just a game of musical chairs. The best thing we can do is watch it all play out as Dr. Kishimoto builds a new leadership team for GPS.
We’ve been posting about the $2 Million loss that the Gilbert Police Department is investigating. A lot of new information should become available to the public in due time. Yes, we’re as impatient as anyone, but we’ve invested a lot of time in sleuthing through some 20,000 documents in one court case, and scads of depositions with 43,000 pages of evidence related to the failed GPS effort to sue CrossPointe. We’ve managed to connect a lot of dots, that’s for sure. We like to share what we learn, too.
For the folks who think we’ve got inside information … you’re right! We’ve been posting a lot of information about administrative contracts and the greed at the top. We posted in December 2013 about goodies in Shane McCord’s 2012-2013 contract, which included a so-called special project for which the superintendent could authorize payment of $2,000. Jeff Filloon got the same good deal. Both assistant superintendents were paid this stipend through their contract term, beginning in July 2012 and continuing through June 2013. Then they both did it again in 2013-2014!
$2,000 + $2,000 + $2,000 + $2,000 = $8,000 = Red Flag of Fraud
Shane McCord: $2,000 school year 2012-2013 Jeff Filloon: $2,000 school year 2012-2013
Shane McCord: $2,000 school year 2013-2014 Jeff Filloon: $2,000 school year 2013-2014
Dave Allison signed almost identical Payment for Work forms for McCord and Filloon. Oddly, the date of the form, April 4, 2012, is the same date on the Completion of Additional Work Responsibilities part of the form, which says the work “will be satisfactorily completed on 6-30-12.” No one signed the authorization “Final and total payment is due.” Now that could be just a typo or a clerical error, don’t you think? Well, this is GPS, and it’s business as usual for the GOBs, so let’s look a little deeper. You can guess what happened.
Jeff Filloon wrote a note to Dave Allison saying he would be working on his dissertation project of “What motivates employees during a recession.” That was his special project worth $2,000 that ordinary GPS employees can’t get. There was a report to Dr. Allison from Jeff Filloon dated May 12, 2013 that reported on data gathered by the GPS Employee Exit Interview, which was just a form with 6 questions to rate from “5 Strongly Agree” to “1 Strongly Disagree” that 135 employees filled out. There was nothing about taking that information and implementing changes into GPS for the purpose of improving employee morale, as Jeff Filloon’s memo said he would do.
Funny thing about requesting public records: GPS has a history of resisting disclosure of just about anything, and when they do let go of documents, sometimes you just stare in amazement at the gems of information you find. We requested copies of the Superintendent’s Memos to the Governing Board; in August 2012, Dave Allison wrote, “The Human Resources Department conducted written exit interviews with all certified employees who left during the 2011-2012 school year.” It looks like the questions were the same as on the survey that Jeff Filloon provided as proof for his Payment for Additional Work in 2013. Connect the dots and you have … Jeff Filloon submitted a survey routinely done by HR as his special project.
Now let’s see what Jeff’s buddy Shane McCord did to earn his special project stipend. Shane wrote a memo to Dave that he was going to study “the relationship that exists between regular attendance and achievement on standardized tests.” Shane McCord submitted a research proposal to Northern Arizona University for the same study of 10th grade students, surveying students around the state using “the probabilistic approach.” Shane helpfully attached dated April 2014 a copy of the letter he sent to “Dear 10th grade student”; in the body of the letter, he asked to return the completed study to him by July 2009. Oooopsie!
A big problem for Shane McCord is that he identified himself as a doctoral student in the Educational Leadership program at Northern Arizona University, NOT as an assistant superintendent in Gilbert Public Schools. Here’s another ooopsie: “The information provided in this survey is confidential information and will be used only by me for the purpose of completing my dissertation.” So what are the chances that Shane McCord actually sent out this survey and letter as his $2,000 special project in 2012-2013???
For 2013-2014, Shane McCord submitted an Employee Action Request for a special project: “Request $2,000 stipend, per contract, for implementing a special project relating to employee betterment.” He signed a memo stating it was a continuation of the project he had been working on since the 2012-2013 school year. No one signed the form, but Jeff Filloon initialed it for approval. Shane McCord submitted a memo titled, “Stipend for Additional Projects.”
Jeff Filloon submitted an EAR with wording identical to Shane McCord’s form in the remarks section for 2013-2014. Jeff Filloon signed the form as the employee and as the approving administrator, in addition to initialing as the Human Resources Assistant Superintendent. He wrote a memo to Dave Allison that was almost identical to the memo he wrote the previous year.
WHAT DID INTERIM SUPERINTENDENT JACK KEEGAN KNOW ABOUT THIS SCHEME? Is that part of the reason that Jack Keegan scampered out of his one-year job several months early? We will connect more dots for you soon.
BOTTOM LINE: When you get paid by a government entity funded by taxpayer dollars, and you take money without doing the work you have been paid to do, that’s what people call FRAUD. It’s amazing that it became so open and obvious that citizens could amass evidence through public records requests. Hey, wait a minute! That’s why public records laws are passed! HAPPY SUNSHINE WEEK, GPS!
Big Fat Asterisk: *As for the aforesaid caught with hands in the cookie jar, the evidence was in public records released by GPS. Those assistant superintendents were giving themselves all kinds of good deals during the years that other GPS employees lived through pay freezes and net income reductions due to higher insurance and retirement costs. Support staff saw the loss of a one-year stipend, a bad bet made worse by Good Old Dave Allison’s calculated move tied to the failed override. Now you know: GOBs are feeding the frenzy against the board so they can slink out without being noticed. BTW, Good Old Clyde Dangerfield was offered the same special project bonus, but he didn’t sign up for the sham deal.
We’re continuing to delve into possible criminal conduct in Gilbert Public Schools. We started with what little information has been made public: $2 Million is not available for educating GPS students. We wondered why Jill Humpherys and Lily Tram are keeping the public in the dark and objecting to a police investigation about what happened to a GPS server that housed Electronically Stored Information (ESI) that was part of the public record that the GPS board is charged with preserving. The stars are aligning and the dots are connecting, and it doesn’t bode well for the Good Old Boys of GPS.
Jill Humpherys came to the March 11, 2014 board meeting armed with ten written questions and she demanded that no one interrupt her until she was finished reading them. Staci Burk answered each of the questions, but she was interrupted by Jill Humpherys several times. The gist was that $2 Million has been taken out of the GPS budget instead of going to the classroom, where it would have made a significant impact on student learning. The board’s previous attorney expressed concern that ASRRT, The Trust, would not pay if the loss was due to criminal acts. If it wasn’t criminal, the board can collect from ASRRT, The Trust, as on any other insured loss. The letter was written by the board president and legal counsel.
Jill Humpherys claimed that the week before, Lily Tram asked for an executive session to discuss the matter of an internal investigation conducted by a well-qualified former prosecutor. She said Lily Tram had questions about spending so much money on an hourly basis, and that was not fiscally sound. Jill Humpherys said, “This is unfair to some of the individuals involved and the district. Yes, some mistakes were made, action has already been taken, and there is no criminality involved. This letter is superfluous.”
This matter has been before the County Attorney and the FBI, according to discussion on the dais. Apparently, the Gilbert Police Department wants to know why something this serious was addressed by an internal investigation instead of being turned over to the police. Destroying public records is a felony, as we have discussed before. Although Jill Humpherys is now saying, “Mistakes were made,” we have been collecting lots of evidence that destroying public records was intentional and habitual. GOBs didn’t want the public to know what was being done behind closed GPS doors [sorry about the image that evoked...have some brain bleach].
It just happens that we have an email from Gilbert Public Schools that confirms Dave Allison’s emails and Superintendent Cabinet Minutes were destroyed. In addition to being crucial evidence in a pending lawsuit, those records were the subject of a public records request. The date is August 26, 2013. The request asked to review a five bullet point list of records. The last two bullet points were:
– review in electronic format all emails to and from Superintendent Dave Allison from February 1, 2011 through June 30, 2012
– review minutes or other notes from the meetings of the Superintendent and his cabinet from July 1, 2009 through June 30, 2013
The public information office responded:
Information for the last two bullet points is not available. Dr. Allison’s email and Cabinet notes no longer exist in either paper or electronic format.
Whoo boy! We were accustomed to being stonewalled in our requests for public records. We were not accustomed to being told the truth by Gilbert Public Schools. We had been asking for similar records in our federal lawsuit, and we were getting stonewalled there, as well, when we asked to review emails of various GPS officials in native format, meaning electronic copies of electronic documents. First, lawyers who work for ASRRT, The Trust, said that asking for emails was burdensome and harassing. Then it became obvious that the geniuses who wrote this answer did not know what they were talking about, but anyway, it’s all our fault they already destroyed the server accounts:
Objection. This request is unduly burdensome and appears to be submitted for no purpose other than to harass Defendants. Without waiving this objection, Defendants have already produced copies of all e-mails and correspondence that are in their possession. Defendants do not have the ability to retrieve the emails in their “native format” for any Defendant who is not currently employed with the District and going back and retrieving all of the e-mails which have previously been disclosed in their “native format” would cause an undue burden on Defendants without any legitimate purpose.
Plaintiffs have not specifically identified what is meant by “native format.” To the extent that Plaintiffs mean retrieving the e-mail from the mailbox of the original sender, the District does not have the ability to retrieve emails from the mailboxes of Defendant Nikki Blanchard and Defendant Dave Allison as those mailboxes have been removed from the server and there is no “back-up” for those mailboxes. Additionally, because the District did not have a “back-up” system for e-mails, any e-mails that have been deleted from the mailbox, and not archived onto a local drive, of any individual sender, cannot be retrieved.
If would take District personnel approximately 8-10 hours per defendant to review the specific preferences utilized for the mailbox, search every file located in the current mailboxes and search all archived files to determine whether there are e-mails in “native format” that can be retrieved and actually retrieve those e-mails. If the e-mails were printed and were not maintained within the District mailbox or an archive file, the District would not be able to retrieve the e-mail in its “native format.”
Clear as mud, right? Actually, there’s another ASRRT, The Trust, lawyer who was advising GPS on ESI in the CrossPointe litigation. Good Old Brad Holm teaches at the Sandra Day O’Connor School of Law at ASU. Here’s part of a letter he signed about ESI with other lawyers across the country:
There are quite a few (over a dozen) law schools that offer eDiscovery as a stand-alone course. These courses are as varied in content as their teachers are varied in personalities. None of the eDiscovery courses we are aware of teach only document review. Also, contrary to one of the comments offered in response to your article, eDiscovery is almost always an issue in “bet the company” litigation.
These eDiscovery courses run the gamut in focus, and they cover the substantive legal issues associated with the preservation, collection, search, and production of electronically stored information. Some of the thorniest issues revolve around the duty to preserve information, spoliation sanctions, and when you hit the tipping point where responding to discovery becomes “overly burdensome.” [signatures are here]
Just to show what serious chops Good Old Brad Holms has in ESI-related issues, here’s information about a fancy conference at ASU about ESI:
The Ultimate 30(b)(6) “Free Fight” Challenge Brad Holm, Holm, Wright, Hyde & Hays | Hon. John M. Facciola (Moderator) | Niloy Ray, eDiscovery Counsel, Littler Mendelson P.C. | Tom Morrissey, Sr. Director, IT Legal Operations & eDiscovery, Purdue Pharma LP
Watch two of the country’s top eDiscovery Luchadores face off in this mock 30(b)(6). Learn tips and tricks for prepping, defending, and taking a 30(b)(6) of a corporate representative on issues relating to IT structure, document retention policies, and litigation holds.
Now, does it sound likely that Good Old Brad Holm didn’t know that it was a crime, obstruction of justice and more, when GPS GOBs destroyed a server while litigation was pending? Does it sound likely that GPS was proud of deleting emails and email boxes of named GPS Defendants in another federal lawsuit?
There’s always more with GPS: Defendants admitted destroying employment files that were required to be saved in an EEOC charge and subsequent litigation. EEOC warned GPS to retain until the end of litigation all personnel records relevant to an EEOC charge filed in October 2011. Instead, right smack-dab in the middle of the lawsuit, GPS decided to destroy records that were central to GPS’s defense. [Face palm - GPS destroyed their own defense!] Here’s what GPS wrote in October 2013:
The Arizona Records Retention laws for the 2010-2011 school year required the District to retain those records for 2 years and 6 months. Position openings for the 2010-2011 school year began in January 2010 and ended in July 2010, consequently Defendants are no longer in possession of any documents that are responsive to this request.
We shall see if the GOBs are still so proud of themselves when the Gilbert Police Department comes calling!
The Town of Gilbert is all a-buzz about possible criminal conduct in Gilbert Public Schools. Apparently, Jill Humpherys thinks an internal investigation into the Good Old Boys and their apparently criminal caper was all that was needed; she really, really wants to release that internal report so the Gilbert Police Department won’t investigate why $2 Million is not available for educating GPS students.
Unfortunately for Jill Humpherys, the Gilbert Police Department said something like, “We prefer you not release the internal report, because it might hinder our investigation.” Considering how Jill always seems to do what her advisors say, it was disconcerting behavior when she pressed on against police preference. Many people noticed. Many people asked what Jill Humpherys is trying to hide, and who she is trying to protect. Knowing what we know about how internal reports prepared by ASRRT, The Trust, lawyers whitewash anything having to do with GPS administrators, we have a pretty good idea of what’s going on. We’ve been connecting more dots about all this, so we’ll share, hoping that birdies will chirp about what’s really going on in GPS.
Let’s start with the meeting of the Governing Board on January 28, 2014. Here’s an agenda item. BTW, we embedded the meeting video at the end of this post.
12.01 Call for Executive Session pursuant to A.R.S. 38-431.03 (A)(3) and (A)(4), Discussion/consultation for legal advice with the attorney/attorneys of the public body concerning the disposition of a server and documents on the server and distribution of reports pertaining thereto and to consider or instruct its attorneys regarding the public body’s position in contemplated litigation or contract negotiations or settlement discussions conducted to avoid or resolve litigation with regard to the disposition of the server and documents of the server.
Here’s what happened: Board Member Daryl Colvin says there was money going down a rat hole and he wants to have discussions in public, not in executive sessions. He wants to clean things up in Gilbert Public Schools, and he is adamant that the public know what has happened. Board President Staci Burk agrees the public has the right to know. More than $2 Million is not available for use in GPS classrooms. Board member Jill Humpherys wants to move on because she needs a break. Board member Lily Tram doesn’t agree with having the executive session, saying it’s late so she wants to go home. Jill Humpherys pipes up that she doesn’t want to discuss it at all. Staci Burk says two people have waited for hours to have this discussion in executive session. The motion passes, 3-2; Humpherys and Tram opposed. The board adjourns into executive session.
A related matter came up at the March 4, 2014 board meeting: Dr. Jack Keegan explains the purpose of new policy BDB was for the clerk to bring concerns or inconsistencies in vouchers to the board, and to add that the itemized account of vouchers will now be posted on the GPS website. BTW, that video also is embedded at the bottom of this post. Here’s GPS Policy BDB.
Approving Policy BDB, which defines the duties of the Board President and Clerk, should have been a no-brainer for transparency in GPS financial matters. Lily Tram doesn’t like this; she wants the clerk to go to the Finance Director about concerns and inconsistencies. Lily Tram says the board should not spend time on this.
[Cover Keyboard's eyes: What The...!]
Board President Staci Burk explains to Lily Tram that the Policy Committee wanted transparency, and wanted a policy that the board should have knowledge and awareness before voting to approve vouchers, which they approve at every board meeting. Jill supports adding into the policy that the Clerk should go to the Director of Finance first. Lily Tram says no, remove the whole bullet point. Jill Humpherys, that paragon of consistency, says she can go along with that. Superintendent Keegan steps in to explain that he thinks this new policy is good, and it’s part of a system of checks and balances. He says if the Clerk isn’t getting answers, the Clerk should go to the Superintendent. He advocates that the Clerk has to have the ability to bring concerns and inconsistencies to the board. “You are the guardian of that,” he says to the board.
Lily Tram doesn’t want checks and balances: “We have delegated that authority to the superintendent. It doesn’t need to come to the board.” Dr. Keegan explains that there have been problems in other districts, that things were hidden, and there were improprieties at the superintendent level. When that happens, it requires a board member or an independent person to bring out what has happened. Lily Tram asks if this policy is supposed to be a check on the superintendent’s ethics. Dr. Keegan says it lets everyone know there are checks and balances. Staci Burk points out the board has delegated to the Clerk the responsibility to review expense vouchers before the board votes to approve them. Lily Tram says this give the appearance that “We have issues.” Dr. Keegan supports that this policy is needed, and the board votes 4-1. Lily Tram voted Nay.
Our next post will discuss more from the special meeting of the GPS governing board on March 11, 2014 and more dots we have connected. You know you can hardly wait…
January 28 @ 1:46:45 time mark:
March 4 @ 1:38:44 time mark:
The GPS Good Old Boys’ network is shattering. GOBs are running for the hills. You didn’t think Barb VeNard’s abrupt departure was a spur-of-the-moment decision, did you? We’re scratching our heads that Good Old Clyde Dangerfield announced his retirement at the beginning of the school year, giving himself a year to cover his tracks. Like that really worked out well for Good Old Dave Allison. <snarky sarcasm>
There was a special meeting of the GPS Governing Board on March 11, 2014 to approve a new contract for a new Interim Superintendent, Dr. Jim Rice. There was this nugget of information, too:
It is recommended that the Governing Board approve the attached letter and authorization requesting that the Gilbert Police Department investigate the alleged destruction of a large volume of public records which occurred on or around May 2011.
This letter shall serve as formal Board approval to consent to a search of and access to District property by the Gilbert Police Department including but not limited to network systems, hard drive, data storage, servers, etc. to ensure that the authorities are able to conduct a comprehensive investigation.
Board President Staci Burk explained this letter would make it unnecessary for the Gilbert Police Department to get subpoenas and search warrants when investigating the complaint that has been filed. Apparently, this is a step toward filing an insurance claim with the Arizona Schools Risk Retention Trust to recoup $2Million for GPS. Interestingly, just a few weeks ago, Mike Tiffany made a presentation at a GPS board meeting, and some pointed questions were put to the dude from ASRRT, The Trust:
“What if our own employee created a significant loss? Can ASRRT reimburse Gilbert Public Schools for the loss?” A GPS employee acted with negligence. Board members don’t think the community should suffer. Mike Tiffany pointed out The Trust covers employees, too.
Long story short: the board voted 3-1 to send the letter to speed up the police investigation into what happened to make the district lose $2Million. Jill Humpherys voted against. Lily Tram missed the meeting. Why was sending this letter controversial at all?
It used to be that $2Million was a drop in the bucket to GPS GOBs – they had big technology override funding and a lot of pals to help them spend their money. This 2007 technology override, for $57.4Million, was a separate pot of taxpayer money for GPS. It was earmarked to purchase computers for students and give them access to the internet. A former board member had this to say about the technology override money management:
What we received on that investment as far as we can tell is -only- access to the internet… albeit, excellent, high quality, access to the internet purchased through a new vendor, Hewlett Packard. Barb VeNard, director of educational services and technology at Gilbert Public Schools, according to the Arizona Republic who obtained copies of the emails through a public records request, sent emails to her husband Jim VeNard, who has been a long time salesman of HP products. These emails allegedly forward inside information about the Cisco price quote during the negotiations of the deal. According to Barb VeNard, there was not a sweetheart deal and instead a pair of independent consultants were hired that recommended the deal to the governing board. According to the Arizona Republic, “In mid-summer, she hired for $3,000 a family friend to act as a consultant, Mike Weaver, and an assistant, Ravi Achanta, to compare the networks in price and quality. The men work for Insight.com in Tempe but were acting as independent consultants.” According to these sources, Ms. VeNard hired a family friend to recommend the deal to the board, after she had sent inside cost information to her husband’s email.
The technology deal that smelled to high heaven was a 2009 gig, so that HP deal must not be what’s behind a $2Million loss of GPS tax money. Revisiting the board meeting with the ASRRT presentation, we found clues that we had unearthed in earlier posts and connected some dots to figure out:
… A big problem for taxpayers was that Clyde didn’t read the CrossPointe contract he advised the board to sign, and later, when there was a question, well … let’s just say our boy had to admit he hadn’t read it. Staff had begged Clyde to read the contract before it went to the governing board, which was expecting something really different than what the contract said. GPS was flush with lots of taxpayer money from a technology override, and for some reason or another, someone wanted to give a contract to a different company … perhaps to extricate Clyde from his dilemma of not reading the CrossPointe contract?
Things seem to be coming around in a circle as the dots line up. We reviewed the RFPs and contracts for CrossPointe in the GPS Purchasing Department in July 2013. We asked for deposition records in the GPS v CrossPointe lawsuit a few months later; GPS told us to pound sand, those depositions were not relevant to our lawsuit, they claimed. We got the deposition records from another source, and lo and behold … they were exceedingly relevant in ways we had not anticipated. We posted about some of our discoveries a while back. We discovered an email that showed Assistant Superintendent Clyde Dangerfield, Esquire did not read the contract, although IT staffer Jean Holte urged him to wade into the weeds on some fine points related to this $1.7Million contract. Clyde said he doesn’t have time to read everything that crosses his desk. Jean didn’t have a job after February 2010, according to Superintendent Cabinet Minutes we received through a public records request.
In June 2010, GPS contracted with Infinite Campus for $1.2Million for replacement student information system software. Somewhere in this saga is the $2Million loss that the Governing Board wants to recoup. The first GPS effort to recoup was a lawsuit, which attorney Brad Holm of Holm, Wright, Hyde and Hays bragged in January 2011 would be a slam dunk win in a short time. We know that didn’t work out so well for GPS. We have wondered, as have many of you loyal viewers, what happened to change the rosy outlook and cause GPS to suddenly settle in mediation.
Circle back to the agenda quoted above: “alleged destruction of a large volume of public records which occurred on or around May 2011.” The date is significant because GPS was smack in the middle of a lawsuit GPS filed. Whatever those public records were, it’s pretty obvious they were related to the lawsuit in federal court. We’re getting closer to an answer about why GPS suddenly settled the lawsuit with no money changing hands. We’ve heard rumors that GPS lost at least $500,000 in costs incurred during that lawsuit. Maybe that’s how we get to $2Million dollars … the $1.7Million GPS paid for software, and the costs of the lawsuit.
GPS funded the lawsuit with taxpayer dollars that were earmarked for educating students. ASRRT, The Trust, doesn’t kick in to pay legal expenses for prosecuting a lawsuit; they pay only to defend lawsuits filed against the district. So what’s the criminality in destroying a large volume of public records? Here it is in a couple of state laws:
A. A person commits tampering with a public record if, with the intent to defraud or deceive, such person knowingly:
4. Destroys, mutilates, conceals, removes or otherwise impairs the availability of any public record;
B. In this section “public record” means all official books, papers, written instruments or records created, issued, received or kept by any governmental office or agency or required by law to be kept by others for the information of the government.
C. Tampering with a public record is a class 6 felony.
A. A person commits tampering with physical evidence if, with intent that it be used, introduced, rejected or unavailable in an official proceeding which is then pending or which such person knows is about to be instituted, such person:
1. Destroys, mutilates, alters, conceals or removes physical evidence with the intent to impair its verity or availability; or
2. Knowingly makes, produces or offers any false physical evidence; or
3. Prevents the production of physical evidence by an act of force, intimidation or deception against any person.
B. Inadmissibility of the evidence in question is not a defense.
C. Tampering with physical evidence is a class 6 felony.
A. An officer having custody of any record, map or book, or of any paper or proceeding of any court, filed or deposited in any public office, or placed in his hands for any purpose, who steals, or knowingly and without lawful authority destroys, mutilates, defaces, alters, falsifies, removes or secretes the whole or any part thereof, or who permits any other person so to do, is guilty of a class 4 felony.
The question we all have to ask: why did Jill Humpherys vote against sending the letter to the Gilbert Police Department? Is she protecting the Good Old Boys? Doesn’t she care that millions of taxpayer dollars are at stake, dollars that should have been spent in the classroom, educating students? How can Jill Humpherys square her vote against the investigation with her fiduciary duty to taxpayers, citizens and students? There will be more to this story, folks.
The GPS Governing Board held a work-study session about a new ethics policy. Something was afoot, but it wasn’t really about the Gilbert Public Schools board ethics policy.
Looks like someone got a burr under their saddle and decided to legislate against… frankly, we were stumped and just couldn’t figure it out.* As the session unfolded, it turned out to be quite a story: it looks like Lily Tram might be miffed that she hasn’t been invited to “party with the Greens.” We’re guessing she didn’t mean the political party Greens.
It gets nuttier… Susan Segal, the lawyer for anyone who will listen to her, advised the board that the proposed policy changes to BCB, Board Member Conflict of Interest, were unenforceable. “Stick with the requirements of the law,” Gust Rosenfeld attorney Susan Segal advised. The red-lined text:
Any board member who has a personal or business relationship with a person or entity that is adverse to the District in pending or contemplated litigation should disclose the relationship and consider refraining from voting upon or otherwise participating in any manner as a board member in any discussion or decision pertaining to the conduct or settlement of that litigation. The term “litigation” includes legal actions claims, and administrative adjudicative proceedings.
We helpfully excerpted the video of the work-study session below. We finally figured out what was really going on when board member Lily Tram tossed out “hypotheticals” about other board members she accused of being friends of the Greens. Lily Tram stated, “I don’t have any evidence.” The other board members, those accused of partying with the Greens, were almost speechless. It was a surreal scene. It dawned on us: Lily Tram’s feelings were hurt!
Lily Tram: ”Say you’re a best friend, or your kids go to school with the Greens, or they’re a teacher of yours or something like that. You guys hang out and party together all the time. (points finger) And Staci, you hang out with them on the weekends or something and have dinner. I’m just throwing examples out there.
Staci Burk: I’ve never had dinner….
Lily Tram: And Daryl, maybe you hang out with them all the time too. Who knows? We all have personal lives, ya know. But that is just an example…”
We’ll set the record straight and maybe Lily Tram’s feelings will recover. We sure don’t want anyone being mad at the Greens!
Lily, the board members you accused of partying with the Greens were the wrong board members: the only board member the Greens partied with was Good Old Jill Humpherys. It was a lovely occasion, full of friendship and laughter. There were probably 100 or more people there. Jill Humpherys circulated throughout the venue, interacting with guests throughout the evening. The Greens mingled with a group of GPS employees and families, chatting and laughing. A few weeks later, Jill Humpherys attended a mediation session with the Greens where the civil rights lawsuit against GPS was settled amicably. We’re sure that Jill Humpherys would feel awful about Lily’s hurt feelings about being left out of those momentous occasions.
The weekend partying Lily Tram wishes she could attend must be in reference to US Air Force fighter pilot traditions. Sorry to say, the closest Officers’ Club is Luke Air Force Base, and it’s just not close enough for routine weekend partying these days. Besides, Sheriff Joe’s tent cities are plenty enough to scare off anyone who might think of driving across Maricopa County in search of a good time. The Greens throw some pretty good parties, but these days, they tend to be intimate dinner parties rather than carousing festivities.
Lily, sweetie, the Greens are known as foodies, and their dinner parties are fun, but you shouldn’t feel left out. No board member has ever attended any of the Greens’ dinner parties. Although dinner parties are nightly events at Chez Vert, most Green weekends are spent working or with family. No board member has been carousing with any Greens. The Greens enjoy partying on ocean voyages, but no board members have been cruising with the Greens. We’re really curious, though, about who has been partying with the Keegans.
[Keyboard: That's just great, Westie. <sarcasm> If Lily Tram hasn't been partying with the Keegans, she'll feel really left out now!]
We would have expected that attorney Susan Segal has taught board members that while they may enjoy legislative immunity for things they say from the dais, there is an ethical obligation to be sure that what you say is true. A modicum of investigation would have revealed that Lily Tram’s allegations against her fellow board members were purely speculative. In the interests of comity and community, a dinner party at Chez Vert might be a good idea for GPS board members. The Greens probably would insist that Lily Tram stay seated in the proper place at the table, though. During board meetings, people worry that Lily might fall off the dais if she scoots much farther away from her fellow board members; the Greens might worry that their homeowners insurance might not cover Lily Tram’s chair maneuvers at the dinner table.
At the end of the day, any changes in the board member ethics policy would be applicable to GPS staff as well, and they’ve already said, “Staff doesn’t want this.” So maybe it’s best to keep the perfectly good board ethics policy that GPS has now, and trust all board members to live up to the high expectations of the community. Heaven knows, the GPS administration needs an example to follow, based on the rumblings about criminal investigations that are running rampant throughout the town these days.
Here’s the work-study session, cued up to Lily Tram’s comments:
Big Fat Asterisk: Why wasn’t the previous board equally concerned about GPS board member Helen Hollands sitting on the dais and voting on sensitive GPS matters while she was, at the same time, being paid big bucks as the public relations flack for Mesa Public Schools? That situation smelled to high heaven, so much so that community members were calling on Good Old Helen to resign. Helen Hollands refused to resign. She served out her term as a GPS board member + Mesa School District top dog.
Gilbert Public Schools has been receiving some bad press locally, based on some loudmouth malcontents who couldn’t control themselves during meetings of the GPS Governing Board. The media was delighted to seize on this and foment more, more and more criticism. It’s important to know that this is just one small group using organizing tactics that often peter out in the long run.
If you thought we were going to link to those news articles and television clips, sorry. That’s too easy. You deserve better from Westie.
[Keyboard: Besides, Eagles songs are a lot more fun! Click the link to the song. Go ahead. We'll wait.]
[Keyboard: Okay, that was not a song. Maybe you'll like this one.]
Some folks just can’t stand being rejected. Like Arizona Education Association president Andrew Morrill, who was loud, rude and disruptive at a recent meeting, according to many eye witnesses. We heard that Arizona Schools Risk Retention Trust lobbyist Gretchen Jacobs was there, too. That’s really something, because Gust Rosenfeld attorney Susan Segal was there, as well, advising anyone in GPS who would listen to her. Inquiring minds would like to know just how much money was billed to what entities for all that high-powered legal presence at a simple board meeting. Lookie here, some other spurned legal dude can’t resist GPS board meetings, either: Chris Thomas, Legal & Policy Services, director of the Arizona School Board Association. As you can see, this cacophony is nothing new. It will subside again.
Here’s some background information about why some top-level administrators are resigning from GPS right now. Mostly, it’s the season: administrators who want to leave generally turn in notice of resignation or retirement before contracts are issued each year, which occurs in early spring (March-April). The same thing is happening in every school district in the state, because state law drives this bus. Administrators in other school districts are watching for opportunities, such as the positions that will be open in GPS – those same candidates will have to give notice to their current employer within the same window. Really, it’s all just a game of musical chairs. The best thing we can do is watch it all play out as Dr. Kishimoto builds a new leadership team for GPS.
Much of the public drama right now comes from some employees who are very concerned about their job security, and rightly so. Continuing teachers have special protections under state law, but administrators and support staff are at-will employees, mostly with annual contracts that are renewed or not renewed each year. As long as specified time constraints are met, those contracts can be non-renewed without giving any reason. If a reason is given, then the employee may have legal recourse available.
Look at some of the admins who resigned or retired: Shane McCord already landed a spot (to be determined) in the Mesa school district. Mark Cisterna is taking his double dipping ways to the Maricopa district. Wendy Peterson has been blabbing on Facebook that she was not sure her job would exist next year, so she jumped ship early on and she’s already got a new job. Maybe some of that job insecurity came about when BarbVeNard up and quit suddenly, which could explain Jim Pacek’s resignation, too. We think there are a few shoes that are going to drop on some of these folks, and maybe others. So stay tuned!
What’s new is that there is supposedly some kind of list, and Brian Yee’s name is purportedly on it. We’re already being treated to a frenzied dog-and-pony show to save Brian Yee’s career, similar to the fracas we all endured last year. Our post GPS Good Old Boys Club Protects Brian Yee – Again has links to last year’s story and to Brian Yee’s Performance Improvement Plan.
Here’s some new information: GPS paid Dr. Rene X. Diaz $1,500.00 to ’coach’ Brian Yee through his PIP. The ‘coaching’ was to consist of a minimum of three face-to-face discussions and telephone or electronic conversations between July 2013 and December 2013. Isn’t that something Brian Yee’s supervisor should have done? This intense focus on ‘coaching’ Brian Yee was worth every penny, right? Looks like the Good Old Boys moved heaven and earth to protect their pal Brian Yee.
Apparently, that wasn’t enough for the new Mrs. Yee. She decided to intervene to protect her new husband’s career … for the sake of their six kids, if nothing else. Sheesh, where else but in a comprehensively mismanaged institution like GPS would it be acceptable for the current Mrs. Yee to write to the Governing Board to beg for her husband’s job? After all, the former Mrs. Yee wrote an angry letter to the board last year.
We post below the new Mrs. Yee’s entire missive — be sure to notice that she includes a confidentiality notice at the end of her letter. That’s icing on the cake, since all email to the GPS Governing Board is automatically a public record. Double sheesh! You might want to have some brain bleach nearby when you read this email about how the current Mrs. Yee hooked up with married Brian Yee:
Hello GPS Board Members,
First of all, I would like to thank you for taking the time to read my letter to you; I imagine you receive many emails and it must be very time consuming to read and respond to all of them. I am writing to you because I don’t feel that what I would like to say to you requires a public forum. For me, the topic is very personal.
I met Brian Yee in October of 2011 in a graduate class I was taking through Northern Arizona University. I was just finishing a master’s degree in educational leadership. Brian presented to the school leadership class I was taking that was taught by Dr. Delecki. He did such a nice job presenting to the class, and seemed like such a nice person, that I asked if he would be my mentor for the school principal internship. I also thought it would be great to have experience at the junior high school level since I already had experience in elementary and high schools in both traditional and online school settings.
Brian accepted my request and throughout my internship experience, he was very professional and I learned many great things from him. He has many strengths, particularly with motivating staff and uniting them in pursuit of clear goals and objectives related to improvement in student achievement. He is also very good at diffusing high stress situations between staff, parents and/or students, continuously leading people back toward doing what is best for students. I could go on and on about Brian’s strengths as an administrator, and his incredible patience and love for his family, friends, and co-workers, but I would like to move on to another topic at this point. Please let me know if you would like more information about all of the truly amazing things he does for our children, family, and loved ones, or if you would like more information about his performance as a school administrator. I am confident that a survey of the staff and/or students and parents at GJHS would be extremely positive and illustrate his many leadership qualities.
After my internship was over, Brian and I continued to be friends. Brian and his wife had been having trouble in their relationship for 10 or more years, they saw a therapist together for 6 of those years, and separated in the Fall of 2010 (before my internship began). They divorced the summer of 2011. Brian and I began spending more time together that summer and eventually became engaged to be married Spring of 2012. We are now happily married and live together in Gilbert with our 6 children; McKenzie (17), Tyson (11), Ella (8), Mary (7), Jett (6), and Rowan (5). I have worked the last 3 years in Chandler Unified School District as the administrator of Chandler Online Academy, CUSD’s online school.
Now that you know who I am and how I came to be part of the family of GPS staff members and Gilbert community, I would like to take a moment to share my perspective/knowledge/insight on Brian’s selection for consideration of renewal before the Board on March 4. I understand that will interpret my opinion and anything I share with you as being biased in favor of Brian, but I hope that you will still value my input and believe me when I tell you I am passionate about school choice, being the leader of an online school, and a proponent of increased accountability and quality for ALL children in public schools. I taught elementary school in the Cartwright school district and have first-hand experience with profoundly disadvantaged families and children. Arizona has achieved great strides in incorporating higher measures of accountability and improved levels of efficiency since charter schools began competing with districts and schools have had no choice but begin to utilize technology and performance indicators to make improvements in how we service our students. We still have a long way to go and I fight every day as the leader of an innovative, new school model, to continue to move the district toward positive change and innovative practices. So, I believe we are on the same page in many ways.
The issue I have is the way that Brian has been targeted as part of this movement toward increased accountability and transparency. It is my understanding that the reason his employment with Gilbert Public Schools as a junior high school principal, is because of what was presented to the board in a collection of anonymous letters. I have read all of the letters and the investigation that then took place, so I am probably as well informed as you are on this topic, regarding the events that took place as they were described in the letters and in the investigation. I know that it would be difficult to read those letters and not come away with a feeling of “disgust”, as Mrs. Smith stated at one Board meeting last year, toward Brian. Many of the same allegations were re-stated in the investigation by the same individuals who wrote the letters (although none of those allegations were proven to be true). That feeling of disgust toward Brian and the actions against him were exactly the intent of those who wrote the letters and who continued with the same or similar stories in the investigation. I am writing to implore that you consider that the individuals who wrote those anonymous letters did so for the following reasons:
- Resentment and anger over not being hired as the principal of HJHS after being the AP at that school for a number of years, in other words angry at not being handed a job she felt she should be given based on what had traditionally been a prescribed number of years that would result in promotion to someone for “time-served” rather than being recognized and promoted for leadership, hard work, and performance qualities
- Resentment and anger over being coached and asked to change in order to provide better customer/student service, in other words, held accountable for performance
Since you read the anonymous letters and let these influence your judgement of Brian’s work performance, morality, and integrity, please be fair and consider that there is more to the story. Take all of the facts into consideration, so that when you take action for something honorable and worthwhile, like improving accountability and transparency in education, you are in fact supporting those ideals, and not undermining them. In the name of justice for Brian, and in the name of accountability and quality education, please help rectify Brian’s reputation and protect his job as junior high school principal in GPS at the March 4 board meeting. He is one of the few who are on your side, who will hold staff accountable for their performance, and who needs your support. You will have many more administrators on your side, willing to hold their staff accountable as they should, if they do not fear persecution and/or termination, as result of a backlash from their staff in the form of anonymous letters or other manipulations.
Chandler Online Academy
1825 S Alma School rd.
Chandler, Az. 85286
“Here’s to the crazy ones. The misfits. The rebels. The troublemakers. The round pegs in the square holes. The ones who see things differently. They’re not fond of rules. And they have no respect for the status quo. You can quote them, disagree with them, glorify or vilify them. About the only thing you can’t do is ignore them. Because they change things. They push the human race forward. And while some may see them as the crazy ones, we see genius. Because the people who are crazy enough to think they can change the world, are the ones who do.” ? Apple Inc.
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, copy, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
That’s it for today. We’re Already Gone!